Japan's Cosmetic Regulations: Cosmetics vs. Quasi-Drugs and the Positive List System
How Japan regulates skincare products — the cosmetics vs. quasi-drug distinction, MHLW approved whitening actives, and how international brands adapt for the Japanese market.
Japan operates one of the most distinctive cosmetic regulatory frameworks in the world. Unlike the US or EU, Japan employs a three-tier system — pharmaceuticals, quasi-drugs, and cosmetics — where the middle tier (quasi-drugs) allows specific functional claims that would be impermissible for regular cosmetics. Understanding this system is essential for interpreting Japanese product labels, understanding why the same ingredient may be found at different concentrations across international versions of a product, and appreciating the regulatory rationale behind Japan's approach to cosmetic safety.
The Legal Framework: PMD Act
Japan's cosmetic and pharmaceutical industries are regulated under the Act on Securing Quality, Efficacy and Safety of Products Including Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices, commonly referred to as the PMD Act (formerly the Pharmaceutical Affairs Law). The PMD Act is overseen and enforced by the MHLW (Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, 厚生労働省), with implementation managed at the prefectural level.
The PMD Act establishes three product categories relevant to skincare:
- Pharmaceuticals (医薬品): Prescription and OTC drugs. Claims of treating, preventing, or curing conditions. Strict premarket approval required.
- Quasi-drugs (医薬部外品): Products with specific approved functional effects. Premarket notification or approval required depending on the product type. Active ingredients must be from an approved positive list.
- Cosmetics (化粧品): Products intended to clean, beautify, or promote attractiveness with only mild physiological effects. Manufacturers register at the prefectural level; no premarket efficacy review, but ingredient restrictions apply.
Cosmetics (化粧品): Definition and Limitations
Under the PMD Act, a cosmetic is defined as a product intended to be applied to the human body by rubbing, sprinkling, or similar methods, for the purposes of cleansing, beautifying, promoting attractiveness, or altering appearance — provided the action on the body is mild.
The critical constraint for cosmetics is on claims: a cosmetic can claim to moisturise, cleanse, soften, or improve the appearance of skin. It cannot claim to treat acne, suppress melanin production, reduce hair loss, or prevent body odour. Making such a claim — even if true — reclassifies the product as a quasi-drug or pharmaceutical, triggering a different regulatory pathway.
Cosmetic manufacturers in Japan must comply with the Cosmetics Standard (化粧品基準), a ministerial ordinance that specifies:
- A positive list of permitted preservatives with maximum concentrations
- A positive list of permitted UV filters with maximum concentrations
- A positive list of permitted colouring agents
- A negative list of prohibited and restricted substances
Ingredients not on prohibited or restricted lists that are not in one of the three positive lists can be used freely in cosmetics, provided they are not being used as functional actives in a quasi-drug capacity.
Quasi-Drugs (医薬部外品): The Middle Tier
The quasi-drug category is where Japan's regulatory framework diverges most substantially from the EU and US approaches. Quasi-drugs occupy a defined middle space: they are not as strictly controlled as pharmaceuticals, but they make specific functional claims that ordinary cosmetics cannot.
Common quasi-drug categories in skincare include:
- Whitening products (美白): Products claiming to suppress melanin production or lighten existing pigmentation
- Anti-hair loss products (育毛剤): Products claiming to prevent hair loss or promote regrowth
- Acne treatment products (にきび防止): Products claiming to treat or prevent acne
- Body odour / perspiration control products
- Dental products with specific fluoride claims
For each quasi-drug category, the MHLW maintains a positive list of approved active ingredients — only ingredients on this list can be used as the functional actives in those products. Active ingredients must be used within approved concentration ranges. The product formulation and label claims must be reviewed and approved (or notified, for products in lower-risk categories) by the MHLW before market entry.
Whitening Actives: Japan's Approved Positive List
The whitening quasi-drug category (美白有効成分) is particularly important for international skincare brands, because "whitening" or "brightening" claims are popular globally but regulated with particular specificity in Japan. The following table summarises key MHLW-approved whitening actives as of recent updates:
| Ingredient (INCI) | Japanese Name | Mechanism | Approved Max. Concentration (approx.) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Niacinamide | ニコチン酸アミド | Inhibits melanosome transfer to keratinocytes | 5% |
| Kojic acid | コウジ酸 | Tyrosinase inhibitor | 1% |
| Arbutin | アルブチン | Tyrosinase inhibitor | 7% |
| Alpha-Arbutin | α-アルブチン | Tyrosinase inhibitor | 2% |
| Magnesium ascorbyl phosphate | リン酸L-アスコルビルマグネシウム | Antioxidant; reduces melanin formation | 3% |
| Ascorbyl glucoside | L-アスコルビン酸2-グルコシド | Stabilised vitamin C derivative | 2% |
| Tranexamic acid | トラネキサム酸 | Inhibits plasmin activity; reduces melanin stimulation | 2% |
| Ellagic acid | エラグ酸 | Tyrosinase inhibitor; antioxidant | 0.5% |
Note: Exact approved concentrations may vary by product category and are subject to MHLW revision. Manufacturers must consult current MHLW notifications for precise regulatory limits.
Preservative Regulation: Japan's Positive List System
Unlike the EU (which uses a combination of positive and negative lists) and the US (which relies primarily on safety substantiation with fewer specific limits), Japan employs a strict positive list system for preservatives. Only preservatives specifically listed in the Cosmetics Standard may be used in cosmetics, and each listed preservative has a defined maximum concentration.
Key examples from Japan's preservative positive list:
| Preservative | Japan Max. Concentration | EU Max. Concentration | US Limit |
|---|---|---|---|
| Methylparaben | 1.0% | 0.4% (single); 0.8% (mixed parabens) | No specific limit (CIR safe) |
| Phenoxyethanol | 1.0% | 1.0% | No specific limit (CIR safe) |
| Benzalkonium chloride | 0.05% (face); 0.1% (rinse-off) | Restricted; varies by use | Regulated as OTC drug active in some uses |
| DMDM hydantoin | Listed; concentration restricted | 0.6% | No specific limit |
Ingredient Naming: INCI vs. Japanese Names
The International Nomenclature of Cosmetic Ingredients (INCI) system — which provides standardised Latin and English ingredient names used in EU and US product labels — has not been fully adopted in Japan. Japanese cosmetic labels use ingredient names from the database maintained by the Japanese Cosmetic Industry Association (JCIA), known as the Japan Cosmetic Ingredient Database (JCID).
Some ingredients share the same name in INCI and JCID notation, while others differ. Additionally, Japanese ingredient names on labels may be written in Japanese script (hiragana, katakana, or kanji), which can make cross-referencing difficult for consumers and formulators unfamiliar with the system. For example:
- INCI "Glycerin" = Japanese "グリセリン" (glycerin, same)
- INCI "Niacinamide" = Japanese "ニコチン酸アミド" (nicotinamide, different common name)
- INCI "Sodium Hyaluronate" = Japanese "ヒアルロン酸Na" (abbreviated form)
- INCI "Butylene Glycol" = Japanese "BG" (common abbreviation used on Japanese labels)
For international brands seeking entry to the Japanese market, ensuring that all ingredient names on labels comply with JCID notation — and that Japanese-language label requirements are met — is a necessary step in the product registration process.
How International Brands Adapt for Japan
Global brands selling in Japan frequently encounter the following situations requiring formulation or labelling adaptation:
- Claim reformulation: A product sold in the EU or US as "brightening" may need to be either registered as a quasi-drug whitening product (with approved actives at approved concentrations) or reformulated to remove the brightening active or claim for the Japanese cosmetic version
- Preservative substitution: A preservative used freely in the US that does not appear on Japan's positive list must be replaced with a listed alternative
- UV filter compliance: Japan's approved UV filter list differs from the EU's; some newer UV filters approved in the EU are not yet approved in Japan, requiring reformulation of sun care products
- Label translation: All ingredient names must be listed in JCID notation; full INCI labels from EU products are not compliant without translation
- Regulatory pathway selection: A product with niacinamide at 5% claiming whitening effects must be registered as a quasi-drug with MHLW notification, not simply sold as a cosmetic
Key Regulatory Distinctions: Japan vs. EU vs. US
| Feature | Japan | EU | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Regulatory body | MHLW | European Commission + Member States | FDA |
| Middle-tier product category | Quasi-drug (医薬部外品) | None (cosmetic or medicinal) | OTC drug |
| Whitening claims | Require quasi-drug registration | Permitted in cosmetics with substantiation | May require OTC drug status if drug claim made |
| Preservative system | Strict positive list with concentration limits | Positive list (Annex V) with concentration limits | No positive list; safety substantiation required |
| Ingredient naming | JCID (Japanese names) | INCI (mandatory) | INCI (required) |
| Premarket approval | Required for quasi-drugs; notification for cosmetics | Responsible person notification; no premarket approval for cosmetics | No premarket approval for cosmetics |
Key Takeaways
- Japan's quasi-drug tier allows specific functional claims (whitening, anti-hair loss) that regular cosmetics cannot make, and requires MHLW approval of active ingredients from an official positive list
- Approved whitening actives in Japan include niacinamide, kojic acid, arbutin, alpha-arbutin, and several vitamin C derivatives, each with defined concentration limits
- Japan uses a positive list for preservatives — only listed ingredients at listed concentrations may be used; this differs from the US approach
- INCI is not fully adopted; Japanese labels use JCID names, requiring translation for international brands
- International brands must carefully assess whether their formulation and claims require quasi-drug registration before entering the Japanese market
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the difference between a cosmetic and a quasi-drug in Japan?
Under Japan's Pharmaceutical and Medical Devices Act (PMD Act), cosmetics (化粧品) are defined as products intended to cleanse, beautify, promote attractiveness, or alter appearance, with only mild physiological effects on the body. Quasi-drugs (医薬部外品) occupy a middle tier between cosmetics and pharmaceuticals — they are intended to prevent certain conditions or achieve specific physiological effects (such as whitening skin, preventing hair loss, or controlling body odour). A product making a whitening claim — stating that it will actively lighten or suppress melanin production — must be registered as a quasi-drug under MHLW review, not sold as a cosmetic.
Which whitening ingredients are approved for quasi-drug use in Japan?
The MHLW maintains a positive list of approved active ingredients for quasi-drug whitening products. Approved whitening actives as of recent updates include niacinamide, kojic acid, arbutin (and alpha-arbutin), ascorbic acid derivatives (such as ascorbyl glucoside, magnesium ascorbyl phosphate), tranexamic acid, and ellagic acid, among others. Each approved ingredient has a defined maximum concentration and specific product categories in which it is permitted. Manufacturers must submit formulations for MHLW review and cannot simply use any of these ingredients at any concentration and call the product a quasi-drug whitening product.
Why do Japanese cosmetics sometimes use different ingredient names than EU or US products?
Japan has not fully adopted the International Nomenclature of Cosmetic Ingredients (INCI) system used in the EU and US. Japanese cosmetic labels may use Japanese ingredient names (in kanji, hiragana, or katakana) alongside or instead of INCI names, based on the names registered in Japan's cosmetic ingredient database maintained by the Japanese Cosmetic Industry Association (JCIA). Additionally, some ingredient names in Japan differ from INCI because they were registered under different naming conventions. Brands selling in multiple markets often list both INCI and Japanese names, which can create the appearance of discrepancy even when the ingredient is the same.
Sources
- • Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare (MHLW), Japan. Act on Securing Quality, Efficacy and Safety of Products Including Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices (PMD Act). Updated 2023.
- • Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare (MHLW), Japan. Cosmetics Standard (化粧品基準). Ministerial Ordinance No. 331 (2000) and subsequent revisions.
- • Japanese Cosmetic Industry Association (JCIA). Ingredient Labelling Standards for Cosmetics in Japan.
- • MHLW Japan. Quasi-drug applications and approved ingredient lists (医薬部外品成分リスト). Regularly updated.
- • Cosmetics Europe. Japan Regulatory Overview — Comparison with EU Regulations. 2022.
- • Ngan V. (2006). Cosmetic regulation in Japan: Overview for international manufacturers. Personal Care Magazine.
- • Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council on cosmetic products.
- • US FDA. Cosmetics Guidance & Regulation. 21 CFR Part 700 (General) and Part 740 (Labelling).
- • Draelos ZD (Ed.). (2015). Cosmetic Dermatology: Products and Procedures. 2nd ed. Wiley-Blackwell.
Disclaimer
This guide is for informational and educational purposes only. It does not constitute medical, dermatological, or legal advice. Regulation data is sourced from official government databases. Always verify with official sources before making regulatory or clinical decisions. Individual skin responses vary; consult a healthcare professional if you have concerns about a specific ingredient.